Actions

Proceeding of scientific-expert Conference on Railway Railcon '24
how to cite this article
share this article

Metrics

  • citations in Portal: 0
  • citations in CrossRef:0
  • citations in Google Scholar:[]
  • visits in previous 30 days:28
  • full-text downloads in 30 days:0

Contents

article: 5 from 11  
Back back to result list
Comparative analysis of train traffic using simulation models
aInstitute of Transportation CIP, Belgrade, Serbia
bUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, Serbia

emailstrahinja.ognjanovic@sicip.co.rs, m.ilic@sf.bg.ac.rs, p.jovanovic@sf.bg.ac.rs, sanjin@sf.bg.ac.rs
Keywords: traction; braking; simulation; open track
Abstract
Trains move in a specific way, along a pre-determined path, i.e. rails. The wheels of railway locomotives and rails are steel, and because of this, it is possible to achieve very high speeds, with relatively low resistance to movement. Analysis and research related to the movement of trains are very important from many aspects, especially for traffic safety. In this paper, a simulation of train movement under realistic conditions was performed. The simulation was created using the Python programming language. Infrastructure data, locomotive data, and resistances were used as input data, which Python later converts for simulation. The results of the simulation are presented both graphically and numerically. All data used in the Python simulation model was also input into the verified railway simulation software OpenTrack. The results from both tests were compared and analyzed, and a report was generated on the feasibility of using the created program in real-world scenarios.

About

article language: English
document type: Original Scientific Paper
DOI: 10.5937/Railcon24051O
published in Portal: 24/11/2024
Creative Commons License 4.0

Related records

No related records

Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

Top SDG Classifications

  • Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure (61%)

  • Partnerships for the Goals (10%)

  • Sustainable Cities and Communities (9%)

Goals Description